Evidence. Expertise. IBD Insights.

Expert-led, clinically relevant updates on emerging inflammatory bowel disease publications, designed for Canadian gastroenterologists and allied healthcare professionals.

Program Overview

Translating emerging IBD evidence into practical clinical insight.

IBD Digital Digest is a medical education initiative designed to make important new IBD research more accessible through short expert-led videos and downloadable publication slide summaries.

Publication summaries

Clear breakdowns of study rationale, design, endpoints, outcomes, and relevance to clinical practice.

Expert commentary

Brief video insights from leading Canadian IBD experts highlighting what clinicians should know.

Downloadable slides

Ready-to-use educational slide decks for local education, discussion, and peer-to-peer learning.

Featured Expert

Dr. Laura Targownik

Dr. Laura Targownik is Director of the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology at the University of Toronto and a clinician-researcher at Mount Sinai Hospital’s IBD Clinic and Zane Cohen Centre. A former Chief of Gastroenterology at the University of Manitoba, she founded the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative in IBD, Canada’s leading real-world and patient-reported data resource. She has authored 180+ peer-reviewed papers and serves on the Royal College Examiner’s Board for Gastroenterology.

Active across national IBD consortia, she previously chaired Equity & Diversity for the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and now leads GI Women CAN!. Her research uses large-scale data to evaluate IBD therapies, improve mental-health care delivery, and understand gender effects on patient journeys and outcomes.

Dr. Laura Targownik
Featured Publications

Recent evidence in focus.

Each publication feature includes an expert video commentary and a downloadable slide deck.

Publication 01

Appendicectomy versus switching to a JAK inhibitor in inducing remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis after biologic therapy failure: COSTA 1-year results

Eva Visser, Maud A. Reijntjes, Lianne Heuthorst, Merle E. Stellingwerf, Rachel West, Koen van Dongen, Rogier M. P. H. Crolla, Susan van Dieren, Jarmila D. W. van der Bilt, Willem A. Bemelman, Geert R. D’Haens, Christianne J. Buskens, for the COSTA Study Group.

Study summary

The COSTA study was a multicentre, prospective, patient-preference cohort study evaluating laparoscopic appendicectomy as an adjunct to advanced therapy compared with switching to a JAK inhibitor in patients with active ulcerative colitis after biologic therapy failure.

  • At 12 months, clinical remission without therapy failure was higher with appendicectomy than with JAK inhibitor therapy.
  • Corticosteroid-free remission, clinical response, endoscopic response, and endoscopic improvement also favoured appendicectomy.
  • Therapy failure and colectomy rates were similar between groups, with a low appendicectomy-related complication rate.
Publication 02

The effect of dose intensification after secondary loss of response to ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease: results of the REScUE study

Peter Bossuyt, Jean-Francois Rahier, Filip Baert, Edouard Louis, Elisabeth Macken, Triana Lobaton, Julie Busschaert, Harald Peeters, Pieter Dewint, Denis Franchimont, Barbara Willandt, Christophe Claessens, Laura Vansteenkiste, Olivier Dewit, Marc Ferrante, on behalf of the Belgian IBD Research and Development group, and Séverine Vermeire.

Study summary

The REScUE study was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Belgium. It evaluated two ustekinumab dose-intensification strategies in adults with Crohn’s disease who experienced secondary loss of response while receiving ustekinumab 90 mg every 8 weeks.

  • All patients received intravenous ustekinumab reinduction, then were randomized to subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks until week 48.
  • Steroid-free clinical remission at week 48 was low and not significantly different between groups: 15% with every-4-week dosing versus 19% with every-8-week dosing.
  • Serious adverse events occurred in 17% and 13% of patients in the every-4-week and every-8-week groups, respectively, with no new safety signal reported.
Funding Acknowledgement

IBD Digital Digest is made possible through funding by:

AbbVie, Celltrion Healthcare, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Takeda